Compliance
Infection surveillance (HAI)
Infection surveillance (HAI) organises cases, relevant results and prevention measures for infection-control teams and authorised clinical staff. Jovimed associates information with review and responsibilities; case classification and treatment decisions remain with professionals.
Configuration, integrations and availability are discussed in your demonstration.
FOR
Infection-control teams · Medical directors · Ward leaders
CONTEXT FOR THE TEAM
MS Order 1101/2016: infection surveillance
Organise records and responsibilities for applicable requirements; competent staff review documents and decisions.
Content reviewed on .
WORKFLOW PREVIEW
Illustrative workflow stages
Conceptual preview · Illustrative data
STAGE 1
A case enters assessment
The suspicion is recorded and routed to the responsible team.
- Ward
- Surgery · example
- Status
- Under assessment
STAGE 2
Results gain clinical context
Results and history are reviewed before the case is classified.
- Owner
- Infection-control team
- Decision
- Clinical validation
STAGE 3
Actions remain traceable
The record brings together classification, actions and the version prepared for reporting.
- Actions
- Owners assigned
- Report
- Ready for review
CAPABILITIES
From the first signal to documented action.
Organise surveillance around an accountable path for suspected cases, assessments and reporting.
Electronic infection register
Record suspected cases, subsequent classification, ward, relevant dates and links to clinical documentation. A suspicion and validated classification are separate states with the times and people recording each step of the assessment.
Microbiology in context
Connect results and resistance profiles to patient and ward information through available integrations. Identifiers, source and sampling or result times are examined before information is associated with the analysis of a particular case.
Antimicrobial stewardship
Track consumption and reviews under approved policies for antibiotics and other antimicrobials. Retain restricted-antibiotic approvals. A review retains the indication and professional examining it without turning recorded consumption into a recommendation about treatment.
Outbreak investigation
Build timelines of cases and responses. Surface connections for epidemiological investigation. The timeline distinguishes observed events from staff hypotheses, and conclusions are documented after available information has been examined.
Reporting prepared for review
Consolidate ward data, identify missing information and prepare exports for the DSP reporting workflow. The period and definitions used are examined before consolidation so data received from different wards carries the same meaning.
Connected prevention
Link actions to sterilisation, biocide, training and occupational-exposure records. Each action remains associated with its observation and examined evidence, with responsibility for closure established by the clinical team.
IN PRACTICE
A new result. An informed team.
A microbiology result needs assessment. Bring it into a shared workflow with the case details and a preserved history.
The responsible professional reviews the suspicion and available documentation.
The team assesses related results and determines appropriate measures.
Classification and response evidence are retained for reporting.
A coherent case history and clear responsibilities from the first signal to completed actions.
RECORDS & TRACEABILITY
Evidence that follows the case.
Prepare internal assessment and reporting from the same reviewed records. Recording a new result does not discard the context of an earlier assessment. The owner can explain which information changed the analysis and when it was examined. During handover, the incoming professional sees open observations and measures needing follow-up within their access rights and clinical responsibilities.
- Cases, classifications and revision history
- Microbiology results and resistance profiles
- Antibiotic approvals, reviews and use records
- Actions, owners and reporting history
BEFORE YOUR DEMONSTRATION
Useful questions.
Who confirms classification of a case?
Classification belongs to authorised clinical staff who examine documents, results and patient context. Jovimed organises the information and retains the review history. An association between events may open an investigation but does not alone establish infection or causation; professionals document the conclusion and the measures they decide are appropriate.
Can it work with laboratory information?
Integration depends on available interfaces, identifiers and data. The demonstration addresses how a result is associated with the correct record and who examines it. An imported result retains its source and relevant time; staff examine corrections or subsequent information before changing the analysis of the case and its documented classification.
How are prevention measures followed?
A measure can be associated with the case or observation initiating it, with an owner and review documents. Staff record what was done and examine completeness before closure. Sterilisation, training and exposure follow-up can provide context, while a clinical decision stays separate from the operational status of an assigned task.
START WITH A CLEARER PERSPECTIVE
Let’s talk about
your hospital.
Discover how registries, traceability and resource management fit into the way your team works.